Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi community,

I have an issue with the Pro EM, that it does not show the correct values.
My Pro EM is connected to a small solar inverter (800W max) with 2 solar panels.
When I look into my OpenDTU at those values and compare them to what the Shelly Pro EM is showing, both values differ much between each other...
As you can see from the pictures, Current and Voltage are the same between both, but the "Power Factor" and "Active Power" is different...
And if I multiply V*A Shelly get's the same value like the OpenDTU. But why is it showing as different value (active power)?

Is there something that needs to be calibrated?

FW running on Shelly is 1.4.3

Thanks for the help!

Shelly.png

OPENDTU.png

Edited by Shelly PRO 3EM
Posted (edited)

Active power takes the power factor (cos phi) into account: Active = U * I * cos phi. The value itself is therefore correct.

With a pure PV feed-in, the Shelly should measure a PF of 1. That is really strange.

Where exactly is the CT connected and how is the PRO EM connected overall?

Edited by tvbshelly
use english
Posted

The CT is located directly in the distribution cabinet.
what do you exactly mean by "how is the EM connected" 

Well I can say, that the second CT connector (EM1(0)) is actually working correctly as it shows a power factor of 1.

image.thumb.png.9dab2f9b02f4fe64d2c87a95771359f9.png

SO as the other one is working, I assume the general connection is good.

I read somewhere that there should be some calicration, but I could not find it.

Thanks!

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I think I have the same problem in that the EM-50 only reports roughly half of what I would expect the current solar production to be.

The first image shows a screenshot of the EM-50, the second and third ones are from the web interfaces of the micro inverters.
The micro inverters only produce new measurements roughly every minute, so of course I would never expect the numbers to match 100%, but right now there is a roughly 240W difference (currently no clouds to affect anything that drastically).

I have also attached a very, very crude drawing of my installation. I hope that helps.
The Relais-Box probably draws a tiny amount of power, but that should be way below <5W.

(Active power is negative because I have "Reverse measurement direction" checked in the settings)

CleanShot 2024-09-19 at 11.57.06@2x.png

CleanShot 2024-09-19 at 11.58.36@2x.png

CleanShot 2024-09-19 at 11.58.52@2x.png

shelly50.jpg

Edited by nifoc
Added Relais-Bow power draw info
Posted
13 minutes ago, thgoebel said:

241W vs. 254,6W ist NOT the half! The difference is within a usual band of tolerance. Moreover, it is unknown whether both screenshots were taken at the same second.

I'm sorry, I should've made it more clear that both inverters have their own web interface and only show the "Current power" that they themself currently produce.
So since I have two, you have to add them together: 244+241=485

All the screenshots were taken within the same minute.

I would expect the EM-50 to show something close to 485, not 254.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Second, not minute, please!

Remarkable is the bad power factor of the inverters: 0,67! Did you feed the Shelly pro EM-50 with the same live wire which is used for both inverters?

Most likely you’re using a different phase, which would validate the factor of 0,67.

Edited by thgoebel
Posted
23 minutes ago, thgoebel said:

Second, not minute, please!

As I have already mentioned in my first reply in this thread, these Deye micro inverters (were the screenshots are from) only produce a new measurement every minute. No matter how hard I try, I will not be able to produce measurements from within the same second.

I'm only looking for roughly matching numbers (when comparing the sum of the micro inverters "Current power" to the EM-50 "Active power"). I don't expect them to be exactly the same.

29 minutes ago, thgoebel said:

Did you feed the Shelly pro EM-50 with the same live wire which is used for both inverters?

Yes (technically it was an actual electrician and not me myself).

Posted

I hope the pictures help.

I won't be able answer any specific questions, because it was not installed by me (because I don't trust myself around a fuse box).

The second (mini) fuse box (that contains the EM-50) was added because it was the cheapest route to go.
This is not the main fuse box of the house, but a sub-distributor.

IMG_3064.jpeg

IMG_3062.jpeg

IMG_3056.jpeg

IMG_3052.jpeg

IMG_3054.jpeg

IMG_3053.jpeg

IMG_3055.jpeg

IMG_3057.jpeg

IMG_3058.jpeg

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Thanks for the pictures! IMHO, the Shelly pro EM-50 is supplied with L3, whereas the current clamp is installed at L1:

IMG_1513.thumb.jpeg.d6e4fe60bd24b4cb7ae0afd81e9255c0.jpeg
 

May be I’m wrong, cause the course of the brown marked wire behind the terminal block L1 - L3 isn’t visible. But this may be checked with a simple test:

IMG_1515.thumb.jpeg.687841030da22b478c5e5bdef5aa93ad.jpeg

 

Edited by thgoebel
  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...